mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multilingual Performance of a Multimodal Artificial Intelligence System on Multisubject Physics Concept Inventories

arXiv 2501.06143 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2025physics.ed-ph cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the multilingual and multimodal performance of a large language model-based artificial intelligence (AI) system, GPT-4o, using a diverse set of physics concept inventories spanning multiple languages and subject categories. The inventories, sourced from the PhysPort website, cover classical physics topics such as mechanics, electromagnetism, optics, and thermodynamics, as well as relativity, quantum mechanics, astronomy, mathematics, and laboratory skills. Unlike previous text-only studies, we uploaded the inventories as images to reflect what a student would see on paper, thereby assessing the system's multimodal functionality. Our results indicate variation in performance across subjects, with laboratory skills standing out as the weakest. We also observe differences across languages, with English and European languages showing the strongest performance. Notably, the relative difficulty of an inventory item is largely independent of the language of the survey. When comparing AI results to existing literature on student performance, we find that the AI system outperforms average post-instruction undergraduate students in all subject categories except laboratory skills. Furthermore, the AI performs worse on items requiring visual interpretation of images than on those that are purely text-based. While our exploratory findings show GPT-4o's potential usefulness in physics education, they highlight the critical need for instructors to foster students' ability to critically evaluate AI outputs, adapt curricula thoughtfully in response to AI advancements, and address equity concerns associated with AI integration.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 162 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2025.

Builds on

13 of 162 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2019PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoningcited by 137
  4. 2024People cannot distinguish GPT-4 from a human in a Turing testcited by 46
  5. 2023Lost in Translation: Large Language Models in Non-English Content Analysiscited by 34
  6. 2024Using Generative AI and Multi-Agents to Provide Automatic Feedbackcited by 15
  7. 2024Teaching LLMs to Abstain across Languages via Multilingual Feedbackcited by 14
  8. 2023AI and the FCI: Can ChatGPT Project an Understanding of Introductory Physics?cited by 13
  9. 2024PhysicsAssistant: An LLM-Powered Interactive Learning Robot for Physics Lab Investigationscited by 8
  10. 2023Enhancing STEM Learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as Objects to Think With: A Case Studycited by 5
  11. 2023Using artificial-intelligence tools to make LaTeX content accessible to blind readerscited by 3
  12. 2024LLM-Generated Tips Rival Expert-Created Tips in Helping Students Answer Quantum-Computing Questionscited by 3
1 more
  1. 2024A Personalised Learning Tool for Physics Undergraduate Students Built On a Large Language Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.