mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Random Sparse Lifts: Construction, Analysis and Convergence of finite sparse networks

arXiv 2501.05930 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2025math.OC stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a framework to define a large class of neural networks for which, by construction, training by gradient flow provably reaches arbitrarily low loss when the number of parameters grows. Distinct from the fixed-space global optimality of non-convex optimization, this new form of convergence, and the techniques introduced to prove such convergence, pave the way for a usable deep learning convergence theory in the near future, without overparameterization assumptions relating the number of parameters and training samples. We define these architectures from a simple computation graph and a mechanism to lift it, thus increasing the number of parameters, generalizing the idea of increasing the widths of multi-layer perceptrons. We show that architectures similar to most common deep learning models are present in this class, obtained by sparsifying the weight tensors of usual architectures at initialization. Leveraging tools of algebraic topology and random graph theory, we use the computation graph's geometry to propagate properties guaranteeing convergence to any precision for these large sparse models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2025.

Builds on

19 of 28 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,373
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,610
  4. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,257
  5. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 658
  6. 2018On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transportcited by 425
  7. 2016Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a Reviewcited by 155
  8. 2019Polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow ReLU networkscited by 121
  9. 2019How Much Over-parameterization Is Sufficient to Learn Deep ReLU Networks?cited by 84
  10. 2021Tensor Programs IIb: Architectural Universality of Neural Tangent Kernel Training Dynamicscited by 57
  11. 2018Deep, Skinny Neural Networks are not Universal Approximatorscited by 37
  12. 2016Convolutional Rectifier Networks as Generalized Tensor Decompositionscited by 32
7 more
  1. 2020The Hidden Convex Optimization Landscape of Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks: an Exact Characterization of the Optimal Solutionscited by 30
  2. 2020Non-Euclidean Universal Approximationcited by 29
  3. 2021Global Optimality Beyond Two Layers: Training Deep ReLU Networks via Convex Programscited by 25
  4. 2021Global Convergence and Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 17
  5. 2021Global Convergence of Three-layer Neural Networks in the Mean Field Regimecited by 16
  6. 2021Named Tensor Notationcited by 11
  7. 2023Convergence beyond the over-parameterized regime using Rayleigh quotientscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.