mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The explanation dialogues: an expert focus study to understand requirements towards explanations within the GDPR

arXiv 2501.05325 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2025cs.CY cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable AI (XAI) provides methods to understand non-interpretable machine learning models. However, we have little knowledge about what legal experts expect from these explanations, including their legal compliance with, and value against European Union legislation. To close this gap, we present the Explanation Dialogues, an expert focus study to uncover the expectations, reasoning, and understanding of legal experts and practitioners towards XAI, with a specific focus on the European General Data Protection Regulation. The study consists of an online questionnaire and follow-up interviews, and is centered around a use-case in the credit domain. We extract both a set of hierarchical and interconnected codes using grounded theory, and present the standpoints of the participating experts towards XAI. We find that the presented explanations are hard to understand and lack information, and discuss issues that can arise from the different interests of the data controller and subject. Finally, we present a set of recommendations for developers of XAI methods, and indications of legal areas of discussion. Among others, recommendations address the presentation, choice, and content of an explanation, technical risks as well as the end-user, while we provide legal pointers to the contestability of explanations, transparency thresholds, intellectual property rights as well as the relationship between involved parties.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2025.

Builds on

15 of 43 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  4. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  5. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
  6. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
  7. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 137
  8. 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 125
  9. 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
  10. 2021Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needscited by 64
  11. 2022Post-Hoc Explanations Fail to Achieve their Purpose in Adversarial Contextscited by 53
  12. 2018The Challenge of Crafting Intelligible Intelligencecited by 47
3 more
  1. 2023Explainability in AI Policies: A Critical Review of Communications, Reports, Regulations, and Standards in the EU, US, and UKcited by 13
  2. 2019Multiple Purposes, Multiple Problems: A User Study of Consent Dialogs after GDPRcited by 6
  3. 2022How Can We Develop Explainable Systems? Insights from a Literature Review and an Interview Studycited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.