mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantum-enhanced causal discovery for a small number of samples

arXiv 2501.05007 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2025quant-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The discovery of causal relations from observed data has attracted significant interest from disciplines such as economics, social sciences, and biology. In practical applications, considerable knowledge of the underlying systems is often unavailable, and real data are usually associated with nonlinear causal structures, which makes the direct use of most conventional causality analysis methods difficult. This study proposes a novel quantum Peter-Clark (qPC) algorithm for causal discovery that does not require any assumptions about the underlying model structures. Based on conditional independence tests in a class of reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces characterized by quantum circuits, the proposed algorithm can explore causal relations from the observed data drawn from arbitrary distributions. We conducted systematic experiments on fundamental graphs of causal structures, demonstrating that the qPC algorithm exhibits better performance, particularly with smaller sample sizes compared to its classical counterpart. Furthermore, we proposed a novel optimization approach based on Kernel Target Alignment (KTA) for determining hyperparameters of quantum kernels. This method effectively reduced the risk of false positives in causal discovery, enabling more reliable inference. Our theoretical and experimental results demonstrate that the quantum algorithm can empower classical algorithms for accurate inference in causal discovery, supporting them in regimes where classical algorithms typically fail. In addition, the effectiveness of this method was validated using the datasets on Boston housing prices, heart disease, and biological signaling systems as real-world applications. These findings highlight the potential of quantum-based causal discovery methods in addressing practical challenges, particularly in small-sample scenarios, where traditional approaches have shown significant limitations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2025.

Builds on

20 of 63 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
  2. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  3. 2017Detecting causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasetscited by 240
  4. 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 214
  5. 2021D'ya like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discoverycited by 209
  6. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
  7. 2013Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Biascited by 165
  8. 2023Causal-learn: Causal Discovery in Pythoncited by 108
  9. 2021Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methodscited by 91
  10. 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 90
  11. 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
  12. 2017Approximate Kernel-based Conditional Independence Tests for Fast Non-Parametric Causal Discoverycited by 76
8 more
  1. 2023A Survey on Causal Discovery Methods for I.I.D. and Time Series Datacited by 35
  2. 2023Discovering Causal Relations and Equations from Datacited by 33
  3. 2021Capacity and quantum geometry of parametrized quantum circuitscited by 32
  4. 2023Enhancing Causal Discovery from Robot Sensor Data in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 16
  5. 2024Practical Kernel Tests of Conditional Independencecited by 13
  6. 2020Quantum Multiple Kernel Learningcited by 5
  7. 2024Optimal Kernel Choice for Score Function-based Causal Discoverycited by 3
  8. 2021Application of quantum computing to a linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for novel medical knowledge discoverycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.