mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Re-ranking the Context for Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation

arXiv 2501.04695 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2025cs.LG cs.CV cs.IRcited by 11

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Document understanding and multimodal RAG

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge to generate a response within a context with improved accuracy and reduced hallucinations. However, multi-modal RAG systems face unique challenges: (i) the retrieval process may select irrelevant entries to user query (e.g., images, documents), and (ii) vision-language models or multi-modal language models like GPT-4o may hallucinate when processing these entries to generate RAG output. In this paper, we aim to address the first challenge, i.e, improving the selection of relevant context from the knowledge-base in retrieval phase of the multi-modal RAG. Specifically, we leverage the relevancy score (RS) measure designed in our previous work for evaluating the RAG performance to select more relevant entries in retrieval process. The retrieval based on embeddings, say CLIP-based embedding, and cosine similarity usually perform poorly particularly for multi-modal data. We show that by using a more advanced relevancy measure, one can enhance the retrieval process by selecting more relevant pieces from the knowledge-base and eliminate the irrelevant pieces from the context by adaptively selecting up-to-k entries instead of fixed number of entries. Our evaluation using COCO dataset demonstrates significant enhancement in selecting relevant context and accuracy of the generated response.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Document understanding and multimodal RAG, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2025.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025RAG-Check: Evaluating Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation Performance7 Jan
  2. 2024MLLM Is a Strong Reranker: Advancing Multimodal Retrieval-augmented Generation via Knowledge-enhanced Reranking and Noise-injected Training31 Jul

Other references · 3

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Invisible Relevance Bias: Text-Image Retrieval Models Prefer AI-Generated Imagescited by 13
  3. 2024Toward Automatic Relevance Judgment using Vision--Language Models for Image--Text Retrieval Evaluationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 2.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Searching for Best Practices in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  2. 2025Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Modal Contexts
  3. 2025Ask in Any Modality: A Comprehensive Survey on Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  4. 2025Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Study of Best Practices
  5. 2025A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  6. 2026Evaluating Modern RAG: Textual, Multimodal, Dense, and Late Interaction Pipelines
  7. 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation and Understanding in Vision: A Survey and New Outlook
  8. 2024A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation for Large Language Models