mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Gradient Purification: Defense Against Poisoning Attack in Decentralized Federated Learning

arXiv 2501.04453 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2025cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Decentralized federated learning (DFL) is inherently vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, as malicious clients can transmit manipulated gradients to neighboring clients. Existing defense methods either reject suspicious gradients per iteration or restart DFL aggregation after excluding all malicious clients. They all neglect the potential benefits that may exist within contributions from malicious clients. In this paper, we propose a novel gradient purification defense, termed GPD, to defend against data poisoning attacks in DFL. It aims to separately mitigate the harm in gradients and retain benefits embedded in model weights, thereby enhancing overall model accuracy. For each benign client in GPD, a recording variable is designed to track historically aggregated gradients from one of its neighbors. It allows benign clients to precisely detect malicious neighbors and mitigate all aggregated malicious gradients at once. Upon mitigation, benign clients optimize model weights using purified gradients. This optimization not only retains previously beneficial components from malicious clients but also exploits canonical contributions from benign clients. We analyze the convergence of GPD, as well as its ability to harvest high accuracy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, GPD is capable of mitigating data poisoning attacks under both iid and non-iid data distributions. It also significantly outperforms state-of-the-art defense methods in terms of model accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2025.

Builds on

28 of 41 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  2. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 568
  3. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 502
  4. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
  5. 2019Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 408
  6. 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 367
  7. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
  8. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
  9. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
  10. 2020Blind Backdoors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 182
  11. 2021Decentralized Federated Averagingcited by 114
  12. 2021CRFL: Certifiably Robust Federated Learning against Backdoor Attackscited by 91
16 more
  1. 2022DeepSight: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning Through Deep Model Inspectioncited by 81
  2. 2020Local and Central Differential Privacy for Robustness and Privacy in Federated Learningcited by 78
  3. 2022An Improved Analysis of Gradient Tracking for Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 69
  4. 2021From Distributed Machine Learning to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 66
  5. 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 58
  6. 2024Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 48
  7. 2023Improving the Model Consistency of Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 45
  8. 2022BEER: Fast O(1/T) Rate for Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization with Communication Compressioncited by 41
  9. 2021FL-WBC: Enhancing Robustness against Model Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning from a Client Perspectivecited by 36
  10. 2023BayBFed: Bayesian Backdoor Defense for Federated Learningcited by 23
  11. 2023Global Update Tracking: A Decentralized Learning Algorithm for Heterogeneous Datacited by 12
  12. 2022Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Inherent Privacy Protectioncited by 11
  13. 2022BlockDFL: A Blockchain-based Fully Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 11
  14. 2022A Compressed Gradient Tracking Method for Decentralized Optimization with Linear Convergencecited by 9
  15. 2022Long-Short History of Gradients is All You Need: Detecting Malicious and Unreliable Clients in Federated Learningcited by 7
  16. 2024Poisoning Decentralized Collaborative Recommender System and Its Countermeasurescited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SoK: Benchmarking Poisoning Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning
  2. 2025The Gradient Puppeteer: Adversarial Domination in Gradient Leakage Attacks through Model Poisoning ↗
  3. 2025GShield: Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning
  4. 2025DROP: Poison Dilution via Knowledge Distillation for Federated Learning
  5. 2025Sybil-based Virtual Data Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning
  6. 2024Concealing Backdoor Model Updates in Federated Learning by Trigger-Optimized Data Poisoning
  7. 2022An Equivalence Between Data Poisoning and Byzantine Gradient Attacks
  8. 2024BadSampler: Harnessing the Power of Catastrophic Forgetting to Poison Byzantine-robust Federated Learning