Revisiting LocalSGD and SCAFFOLD: Improved Rates and Missing Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
LocalSGD and SCAFFOLD are widely used methods in distributed stochastic optimization, with numerous applications in machine learning, large-scale data processing, and federated learning. However, rigorously establishing their theoretical advantages over simpler methods, such as minibatch SGD (MbSGD), has proven challenging, as existing analyses often rely on strong assumptions, unrealistic premises, or overly restrictive scenarios. In this work, we revisit the convergence properties of LocalSGD and SCAFFOLD under a variety of existing or weaker conditions, including gradient similarity, Hessian similarity, weak convexity, and Lipschitz continuity of the Hessian. Our analysis shows that (i) LocalSGD achieves faster convergence compared to MbSGD for weakly convex functions without requiring stronger gradient similarity assumptions; (ii) LocalSGD benefits significantly from higher-order similarity and smoothness; and (iii) SCAFFOLD demonstrates faster convergence than MbSGD for a broader class of non-quadratic functions. These theoretical insights provide a clearer understanding of the conditions under which LocalSGD and SCAFFOLD outperform MbSGD.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2025.
Builds on
27 of 41 references.
References · 27
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
- 2020Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Frameworkcited by 449
- 2014SAGA: A Fast Incremental Gradient Method With Support for Non-Strongly Convex Composite Objectivescited by 401
- 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
- 2020FedML: A Research Library and Benchmark for Federated Machine Learningcited by 298
- 2018Parallel Restarted SGD with Faster Convergence and Less Communication: Demystifying Why Model Averaging Works for Deep Learningcited by 277
- 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
- 2020Minibatch vs Local SGD for Heterogeneous Distributed Learningcited by 147
- 2022ProxSkip: Yes! Local Gradient Steps Provably Lead to Communication Acceleration! Finally!cited by 134
15 more
- 2013Communication Efficient Distributed Optimization using an Approximate Newton-type Methodcited by 131
- 2023Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated Learning with Communication Compressioncited by 100
- 2018SGD and Hogwild! Convergence Without the Bounded Gradients Assumptioncited by 94
- 2017On the convergence properties of a K-step averaging stochastic gradient descent algorithm for nonconvex optimizationcited by 91
- 2021Bias-Variance Reduced Local SGD for Less Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 30
- 2020Statistically Preconditioned Accelerated Gradient Method for Distributed Optimizationcited by 29
- 2023Understanding Generalization of Federated Learning via Stability: Heterogeneity Matterscited by 27
- 2023Why (and When) does Local SGD Generalize Better than SGD?cited by 26
- 2022Faster federated optimization under second-order similaritycited by 18
- 2021Decentralized Personalized Federated Learning: Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithm for All Personalization Modescited by 13
- 2013Mini-Batch Primal and Dual Methods for SVMscited by 12
- 2024The Limits and Potentials of Local SGD for Distributed Heterogeneous Learning with Intermittent Communicationcited by 12
- 2024Federated Optimization with Doubly Regularized Drift Correctioncited by 10
- 2020STL-SGD: Speeding Up Local SGD with Stagewise Communication Periodcited by 8
- 2023Lessons from Generalization Error Analysis of Federated Learning: You May Communicate Less Often!cited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.