Comparison of Neural Models for X-ray Image Classification in COVID-19 Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study presents a comparative analysis of methods for detecting COVID-19 infection in radiographic images. The images, sourced from publicly available datasets, were categorized into three classes: 'normal,' 'pneumonia,' and 'COVID.' For the experiments, transfer learning was employed using eight pre-trained networks: SqueezeNet, DenseNet, ResNet, AlexNet, VGG, GoogleNet, ShuffleNet, and MobileNet. DenseNet achieved the highest accuracy of 97.64% using the ADAM optimization function in the multiclass approach. In the binary classification approach, the highest precision was 99.98%, obtained by the VGG, ResNet, and MobileNet networks. A comparative evaluation was also conducted using heat maps.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2025.
Builds on
9 of 21 references.
References · 9
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,194
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
- 2020COVID-19 Image Data Collection: Prospective Predictions Are the Futurecited by 100
- 2020Deep Learning for Screening COVID-19 using Chest X-Ray Imagescited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.