mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Code to Compliance: Assessing ChatGPT's Utility in Designing an Accessible Webpage -- A Case Study

arXiv 2501.03572 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2025cs.HC cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Web accessibility ensures that individuals with disabilities can access and interact with digital content without barriers, yet a significant majority of most used websites fail to meet accessibility standards. This study evaluates ChatGPT's (GPT-4o) ability to generate and improve web pages in line with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). While ChatGPT can effectively address accessibility issues when prompted, its default code often lacks compliance, reflecting limitations in its training data and prevailing inaccessible web practices. Automated and manual testing revealed strengths in resolving simple issues but challenges with complex tasks, requiring human oversight and additional iterations. Unlike prior studies, we incorporate manual evaluation, dynamic elements, and use the visual reasoning capability of ChatGPT along with the prompts to fix accessibility issues. Providing screenshots alongside prompts enhances the LLM's ability to address accessibility issues by allowing it to analyze surrounding components, such as determining appropriate contrast colors. We found that effective prompt engineering, such as providing concise, structured feedback and incorporating visual aids, significantly enhances ChatGPT's performance. These findings highlight the potential and limitations of large language models for accessible web development, offering practical guidance for developers to create more inclusive websites.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2025.

Builds on

5 of 31 references.

References · 5

  1. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
  2. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
  3. 2024Make Your LLM Fully Utilize the Contextcited by 118
  4. 2024What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Studycited by 52
  5. 2024Using AI-Based Coding Assistants in Practice: State of Affairs, Perceptions, and Ways Forwardcited by 44

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Blind Edits to Verified Repair: Building Trustworthy User-Side LLM Agents for Web Accessibility
  2. 2026Agentic Web Accessibility Auditing: A Criterion-Specific Framework for Translating WCAG Requirements into Assessments
  3. 2026LLM Based Web Accessibility Repair: An Empirical Study of Detection, Remediation, and Cost
  4. 2025Towards Scalable Web Accessibility Audit with MLLMs as Copilots
  5. 2026"Zooming In" on Agentic Web Browsers as Assistive Technologies: A Case Study with a Low-Vision Technology Expert
  6. 2024Automated Code Fix Suggestions for Accessibility Issues in Mobile Apps
  7. 2023ChatGPT is a Remarkable Tool -- For Experts
  8. 2025Template-Based Text-to-Image Alignment for Language Accessibility: A Study on Visualizing Text Simplifications