Reading with Intent -- Neutralizing Intent
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval
Abstract (arXiv)
Queries to large language models (LLMs) can be divided into two parts: the instruction/question and the accompanying context. The context for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems in most benchmarks comes from Wikipedia or Wikipedia-like texts which are written in a neutral and factual tone. However, when RAG systems retrieve internet-based content, they encounter text with diverse tones and linguistic styles, introducing challenges for downstream tasks. The Reading with Intent task addresses this issue by evaluating how varying tones in context passages affect model performance. Building on prior work that focused on sarcasm, we extend this paradigm by constructing a dataset where context passages are transformed to 11 distinct emotions using a better synthetic data generation approach. Using this dataset, we train an emotion translation model to systematically adapt passages to specified emotional tones. The human evaluation shows that the LLM fine-tuned to become the emotion-translator benefited from the synthetically generated data. Finally, the emotion-translator is used in the Reading with Intent task to transform the passages to a neutral tone. By neutralizing the passages, it mitigates the challenges posed by sarcastic passages and improves overall results on this task by about 3%.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Emotional RAG LLMs: Reading Comprehension for the Open Internet
- 2026TA-RAG: Tone Awareness as a Design Imperative for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2026TEMPER: Testing Emotional Perturbation in Quantitative Reasoning
- 2026Do Emotions in Prompts Matter? Effects of Emotional Framing on Large Language Models
- 2024LLMs are Biased Evaluators But Not Biased for Retrieval Augmented Generation
- 2025Out of Style: RAG's Fragility to Linguistic Variation
- 2026Combining Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation with LLMs for Reading Content Recommendations
- 2024From RAGs to rich parameters: Probing how language models utilize external knowledge over parametric information for factual queries