ADePT: Adaptive Decomposed Prompt Tuning for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prompt Tuning (PT) enables the adaptation of Pre-trained Large Language Models (PLMs) to downstream tasks by optimizing a small amount of soft virtual tokens, which are prepended to the input token embeddings. Recently, Decomposed Prompt Tuning (DePT) has demonstrated superior adaptation capabilities by decomposing the soft prompt into a shorter soft prompt and a pair of low-rank matrices. The product of the pair of low-rank matrices is added to the input token embeddings to offset them. Additionally, DePT achieves faster inference compared to PT due to the shorter soft prompt. However, in this paper, we find that the position-based token embedding offsets of DePT restrict its ability to generalize across diverse model inputs, and that the shared embedding offsets across many token embeddings result in sub-optimization. To tackle these issues, we introduce Adaptive Decomposed Prompt Tuning (ADePT), which is composed of a short soft prompt and a shallow token-shared feed-forward neural network. ADePT utilizes the token-shared feed-forward neural network to learn the embedding offsets for each token, enabling adaptive embedding offsets that vary according to the model input and better optimization of token embedding offsets. This enables ADePT to achieve superior adaptation performance without requiring more inference time or additional trainable parameters compared to vanilla PT and its variants. In comprehensive experiments across 23 natural language processing tasks and 4 typical PLMs of different scales, ADePT consistently surpasses the other leading parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, and even outperforms the full fine-tuning in certain scenarios. We also provide a theoretical analysis towards ADePT. Code is available at https://github.com/HungerPWAY/ADePT.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2025.
Builds on
43 of 54 references.
References · 43
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
31 more
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 876
- 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 458
- 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
- 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
- 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 351
- 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 330
- 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 294
- 2021Parameter-efficient Multi-task Fine-tuning for Transformers via Shared Hypernetworkscited by 278
- 2021SPoT: Better Frozen Model Adaptation through Soft Prompt Transfercited by 235
- 2022LST: Ladder Side-Tuning for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 228
- 2020AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformerscited by 223
- 2017SearchQA: A New Q&A Dataset Augmented with Context from a Search Enginecited by 221
- 2018ReCoRD: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Commonsense Reading Comprehensioncited by 198
- 2019MRQA 2019 Shared Task: Evaluating Generalization in Reading Comprehensioncited by 183
- 2023Multitask Prompt Tuning Enables Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 115
- 2022ATTEMPT: Parameter-Efficient Multi-task Tuning via Attentional Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 85
- 2022HyperPrompt: Prompt-based Task-Conditioning of Transformerscited by 67
- 2023Residual Prompt Tuning: Improving Prompt Tuning with Residual Reparameterizationcited by 64
- 2023When Do Prompting and Prefix-Tuning Work? A Theory of Capabilities and Limitationscited by 41
- 2022XPrompt: Exploring the Extreme of Prompt Tuningcited by 30
- 2022Hyperdecoders: Instance-specific decoders for multi-task NLPcited by 21
- 2023Decomposed Prompt Tuning via Low-Rank Reparameterizationcited by 8
- 2024Prompt Tuning Strikes Back: Customizing Foundation Models with Low-Rank Prompt Adaptationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.