Toward Inclusive Educational AI: Auditing Frontier LLMs through a Multiplexity Lens
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and Llama 3 become integral to educational contexts, concerns are mounting over the cultural biases, power imbalances, and ethical limitations embedded within these technologies. Though generative AI tools aim to enhance learning experiences, they often reflect values rooted in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) cultural paradigms, potentially sidelining diverse global perspectives. This paper proposes a framework to assess and mitigate cultural bias within LLMs through the lens of applied multiplexity. Multiplexity, inspired by Senturk et al. and rooted in Islamic and other wisdom traditions, emphasizes the coexistence of diverse cultural viewpoints, supporting a multi-layered epistemology that integrates both empirical sciences and normative values. Our analysis reveals that LLMs frequently exhibit cultural polarization, with biases appearing in both overt responses and subtle contextual cues. To address inherent biases and incorporate multiplexity in LLMs, we propose two strategies: textitContextually-Implemented Multiplex LLMs, which embed multiplex principles directly into the system prompt, influencing LLM outputs at a foundational level and independent of individual prompts, and textitMulti-Agent System (MAS)-Implemented Multiplex LLMs, where multiple LLM agents, each representing distinct cultural viewpoints, collaboratively generate a balanced, synthesized response. Our findings demonstrate that as mitigation strategies evolve from contextual prompting to MAS-implementation, cultural inclusivity markedly improves, evidenced by a significant rise in the Perspectives Distribution Score (PDS) and a PDS Entropy increase from 3.25% at baseline to 98% with the MAS-Implemented Multiplex LLMs. Sentiment analysis further shows a shift towards positive sentiment across cultures,...
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2025.
Builds on
12 of 28 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 376
- 2023MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoningcited by 311
- 2023Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 149
- 2022The Ghost in the Machine has an American accent: value conflict in GPT-3cited by 105
- 2024ProtAgents: Protein discovery via large language model multi-agent collaborations combining physics and machine learningcited by 63
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Chatbots: An Overviewcited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Survey of Cultural Awareness in Language Models: Text and Beyond
- 2025'Too much alignment; not enough culture': Re-balancing cultural alignment practices in LLMs
- 2024Evaluating Cultural Awareness of LLMs for Yoruba, Malayalam, and English
- 2023CDEval: A Benchmark for Measuring the Cultural Dimensions of Large Language Models
- 2024Whose Morality Do They Speak? Unraveling Cultural Bias in Multilingual Language Models
- 2025Assessing Agentic Large Language Models in Multilingual National Bias
- 2025Cultural Bias in Large Language Models: Evaluating AI Agents through Moral Questionnaires
- 2023Potential Benefits of Employing Large Language Models in Research in Moral Education and Development