Putnam's Critical and Explanatory Tendencies Interpreted from a Machine Learning Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Making sense of theory choice in normal and across extraordinary science is central to philosophy of science. The emergence of machine learning models has the potential to act as a wrench in the gears of current debates. In this paper, I will attempt to reconstruct the main movements that lead to and came out of Putnam's critical and explanatory tendency distinction, argue for the biconditional necessity of the tendencies, and conceptualize that wrench through a machine learning interpretation of my claim.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2025.
Builds on
3 of 6 references.
References · 3
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 331
- 2024A Phenomenological AI Foundation Model for Physical Signalscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.