mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When is the Computation of a Feature Attribution Method Tractable?

arXiv 2501.02356 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature attribution methods have become essential for explaining machine learning models. Many popular approaches, such as SHAP and Banzhaf values, are grounded in power indices from cooperative game theory, which measure the contribution of features to model predictions. This work studies the computational complexity of power indices beyond SHAP, addressing the conditions under which they can be computed efficiently. We identify a simple condition on power indices that ensures that computation is polynomially equivalent to evaluating expected values, extending known results for SHAP. We also introduce Bernoulli power indices, showing that their computation can be simplified to a constant number of expected value evaluations. Furthermore, we explore interaction power indices that quantify the importance of feature subsets, proving that their computation complexity mirrors that of individual features.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2025.

Builds on

12 of 21 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  4. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  5. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  6. 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
  7. 2022Data Banzhaf: A Robust Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 132
  8. 2020On the Tractability of SHAP Explanationscited by 92
  9. 2021On the Complexity of SHAP-Score-Based Explanations: Tractability via Knowledge Compilation and Non-Approximability Resultscited by 32
  10. 2023Logic for Explainable AIcited by 23
  11. 2019What to Expect of Classifiers? Reasoning about Logistic Regression with Missing Featurescited by 12
  12. 2020Handling Missing Data in Decision Trees: A Probabilistic Approachcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.