A Unifying View of Linear Function Approximation in Off-Policy RL Through Matrix Splitting and Preconditioning
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
In off-policy policy evaluation (OPE) tasks within reinforcement learning, Temporal Difference Learning(TD) and Fitted Q-Iteration (FQI) have traditionally been viewed as differing in the number of updates toward the target value function: TD makes one update, FQI makes an infinite number, and Partial Fitted Q-Iteration (PFQI) performs a finite number. We show that this view is not accurate, and provide a new mathematical perspective under linear value function approximation that unifies these methods as a single iterative method solving the same linear system, but using different matrix splitting schemes and preconditioners. We show that increasing the number of updates under the same target value function, i.e., the target network technique, is a transition from using a constant preconditioner to using a data-feature adaptive preconditioner. This elucidates, for the first time, why TD convergence does not necessarily imply FQI convergence, and establishes tight convergence connections among TD, PFQI, and FQI. Our framework enables sharper theoretical results than previous work and characterization of the convergence conditions for each algorithm, without relying on assumptions about the features (e.g., linear independence). We also provide an encoder-decoder perspective to better understand the convergence conditions of TD, and prove, for the first time, that when a large learning rate doesn't work, trying a smaller one may help. Our framework also leads to the discovery of new crucial conditions on features for convergence, and shows how common assumptions about features influence convergence, e.g., the assumption of linearly independent features can be dropped without compromising the convergence guarantees of stochastic TD in the on-policy setting. This paper is also the first to introduce matrix splitting into the convergence analysis of these algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Understanding the theoretical properties of projected Bellman equation, linear Q-learning, and approximate value iterationcited by 6
- 2026Periodic Regularized Q-Learningcited by 1
- 2026Limiting-Kernel Q(λ): Bridging Short and Long Horizonscited by 0
- 2026A Contraction Framework for Stochastic Operators with Bootstrapping: Application to TD Learningcited by 0
- 2026A Contraction Framework for Stochastic Operators with Bootstrapping: Application to TD Learning24 Sep 2026
- 2026Limiting-Kernel Q(λ): Bridging Short and Long Horizons23 Sep 2026
- 2026Periodic Regularized Q-Learning3 Feb 2026
- 2025Understanding the theoretical properties of projected Bellman equation, linear Q-learning, and approximate value iteration15 Apr 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Decision-Centered Abstractions via Orthogonal Estimation of Difference-of-Q Functions
- 2025Analysis of Off-Policy n-Step TD-Learning with Linear Function Approximation
- 2024Fitted Q-Iteration via Max-Plus-Linear Approximation
- 2022Offline Reinforcement Learning with Differentiable Function Approximation is Provably Efficient
- 2024Strongly-polynomial time and validation analysis of policy gradient methods
- 2024Reward-Relevance-Filtered Linear Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 2023Offline Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Q-Function Regularization
- 2021Infinite-Horizon Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation: Curse of Dimensionality and Algorithm