mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transaction Level Hierarchy Guided and Functional Coverage Driven Deductive Formal Verification

arXiv 2501.01534 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2025cs.AR cs.LOcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We demonstrate how dynamic verification (e.g. simulation) can be replaced by deductive formal verification and how to benefit from the advantages of symbolic verification and the reuse of verification proofs. To do this, we swap the well-known module-hierarchy based concept with a transaction-level (TL) based alternative, which still allows us to describe the design as precisely as on RTL. We enhance the aspect-oriented and TL oriented language PDVL to support the definition of functional coverage (FC) and assertions at all levels of a TL-hierarchy. We then show how to use a deductive formal verification (DFV) flow which compiles PDVL code into Gallina code to be used by the Coq theorem prover. It can be argued that FC can be converted into proof obligations and that proving them is equivalent to 100% coverage. We also demonstrate how lower-level proofs can be reused when verifying aspects at higher-levels of a TL-hierarchy. We argue that the traditional assertion-based verification (ABV) methodology is still supported and SVA can be proven using DFV.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.