mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Refinement Strategies for LLM-based Product Attribute Value Extraction

arXiv 2501.01237 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Structured product data, in the form of attribute-value pairs, is essential for e-commerce platforms to support features such as faceted product search and attribute-based product comparison. However, vendors often provide unstructured product descriptions, making attribute value extraction necessary to ensure data consistency and usability. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their potential for product attribute value extraction in few-shot scenarios. Recent research has shown that self-refinement techniques can improve the performance of LLMs on tasks such as code generation and text-to-SQL translation. For other tasks, the application of these techniques has resulted in increased costs due to processing additional tokens, without achieving any improvement in performance. This paper investigates applying two self-refinement techniques (error-based prompt rewriting and self-correction) to the product attribute value extraction task. The self-refinement techniques are evaluated across zero-shot, few-shot in-context learning, and fine-tuning scenarios using GPT-4o. The experiments show that both self-refinement techniques fail to significantly improve the extraction performance while substantially increasing processing costs. For scenarios with development data, fine-tuning yields the highest performance, while the ramp-up costs of fine-tuning are balanced out as the amount of product descriptions increases.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2025.

Builds on

15 of 21 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  4. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  5. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  6. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
  7. 2023Is Self-Repair a Silver Bullet for Code Generation?cited by 191
  8. 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 183
  9. 2023LLMs Accelerate Annotation for Medical Information Extractioncited by 77
  10. 2022Code4Struct: Code Generation for Few-Shot Event Structure Predictioncited by 70
  11. 2021MAVE: A Product Dataset for Multi-source Attribute Value Extractioncited by 53
  12. 2024LLM-Ensemble: Optimal Large Language Model Ensemble Method for E-commerce Product Attribute Value Extractioncited by 39
3 more
  1. 2022GENEVA: Benchmarking Generalizability for Event Argument Extraction with Hundreds of Event Types and Argument Rolescited by 25
  2. 2022OA-Mine: Open-World Attribute Mining for E-Commerce Products with Weak Supervisioncited by 20
  3. 2024Using LLMs for the Extraction and Normalization of Product Attribute Valuescited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.