Exploring Information Processing in Large Language Models: Insights from Information Bottleneck Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks by understanding input information and predicting corresponding outputs. However, the internal mechanisms by which LLMs comprehend input and make effective predictions remain poorly understood. In this paper, we explore the working mechanism of LLMs in information processing from the perspective of Information Bottleneck Theory. We propose a non-training construction strategy to define a task space and identify the following key findings: (1) LLMs compress input information into specific task spaces (e.g., sentiment space, topic space) to facilitate task understanding; (2) they then extract and utilize relevant information from the task space at critical moments to generate accurate predictions. Based on these insights, we introduce two novel approaches: an Information Compression-based Context Learning (IC-ICL) and a Task-Space-guided Fine-Tuning (TS-FT). IC-ICL enhances reasoning performance and inference efficiency by compressing retrieved example information into the task space. TS-FT employs a space-guided loss to fine-tune LLMs, encouraging the learning of more effective compression and selection mechanisms. Experiments across multiple datasets validate the effectiveness of task space construction. Additionally, IC-ICL not only improves performance but also accelerates inference speed by over 40%, while TS-FT achieves superior results with a minimal strategy adjustment.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.
9 papers.
- 2025Mitigating Visual Knowledge Forgetting in MLLM Instruction-tuning via Modality-decoupled Gradient Descentcited by 13
- 2025HiProbe-VAD: Video Anomaly Detection via Hidden States Probing in Tuning-Free Multimodal LLMscited by 9
- 2025Topic Identification in LLM Input-Output Pairs through the Lens of Information Bottleneckcited by 1
- 2025Breaking Memorization Barriers in LLM Code Fine-Tuning via Information Bottleneck for Improved Generalizationcited by 1
- 2026Is my model "mind blurting"? Interpreting the dynamics of reasoning tokens with Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA)cited by 1
- 2026WaterVIB: Learning Minimal Sufficient Watermark Representations via Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 1
- 2025FlowNIB: An Information Bottleneck Analysis of Bidirectional vs. Unidirectional Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Limits of Reliability and Scaling in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026When VLMs Destroy What They Know: Spatial Representations Fall Below Lexical Priorscited by 0
- 2026When VLMs Destroy What They Know: Spatial Representations Fall Below Lexical Priors9 Oct 2026
- 2026Limits of Reliability and Scaling in Language Models8 May 2026
- 2026WaterVIB: Learning Minimal Sufficient Watermark Representations via Variational Information Bottleneck25 Feb 2026
- 2026Is my model "mind blurting"? Interpreting the dynamics of reasoning tokens with Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA)5 Feb 2026
- 2025Breaking Memorization Barriers in LLM Code Fine-Tuning via Information Bottleneck for Improved Generalization15 Oct 2025
- 2025Topic Identification in LLM Input-Output Pairs through the Lens of Information Bottleneck26 Aug 2025
- 2025HiProbe-VAD: Video Anomaly Detection via Hidden States Probing in Tuning-Free Multimodal LLMs23 Jul 2025
- 2025FlowNIB: An Information Bottleneck Analysis of Bidirectional vs. Unidirectional Language Models1 Jun 2025
- 2025Mitigating Visual Knowledge Forgetting in MLLM Instruction-tuning via Modality-decoupled Gradient Descent17 Feb 2025