mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Standardization of Clinical Notes using Large Language Models

arXiv 2501.00644 ↗First posted 31 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinician notes are a rich source of patient information but often contain inconsistencies due to varied writing styles, colloquialisms, abbreviations, medical jargon, grammatical errors, and non-standard formatting. These inconsistencies hinder the extraction of meaningful data from electronic health records (EHRs), posing challenges for quality improvement, population health, precision medicine, decision support, and research. We present a large language model approach to standardizing a corpus of 1,618 clinical notes. Standardization corrected an average of 4.9 +/- 1.8 grammatical errors, 3.3 +/- 5.2 spelling errors, converted 3.1 +/- 3.0 non-standard terms to standard terminology, and expanded 15.8 +/- 9.1 abbreviations and acronyms per note. Additionally, notes were re-organized into canonical sections with standardized headings. This process prepared notes for key concept extraction, mapping to medical ontologies, and conversion to interoperable data formats such as FHIR. Expert review of randomly sampled notes found no significant data loss after standardization. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that standardization of clinical notes can improve their readability, consistency, and usability, while also facilitating their conversion into interoperable data formats.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.