LicenseGPT: A Fine-tuned Foundation Model for Publicly Available Dataset License Compliance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dataset license compliance is a critical yet complex aspect of developing commercial AI products, particularly with the increasing use of publicly available datasets. Ambiguities in dataset licenses pose significant legal risks, making it challenging even for software IP lawyers to accurately interpret rights and obligations. In this paper, we introduce LicenseGPT, a fine-tuned foundation model (FM) specifically designed for dataset license compliance analysis. We first evaluate existing legal FMs (i.e., FMs specialized in understanding and processing legal texts) and find that the best-performing model achieves a Prediction Agreement (PA) of only 43.75%. LicenseGPT, fine-tuned on a curated dataset of 500 licenses annotated by legal experts, significantly improves PA to 64.30%, outperforming both legal and general-purpose FMs. Through an A/B test and user study with software IP lawyers, we demonstrate that LicenseGPT reduces analysis time by 94.44%, from 108 seconds to 6 seconds per license, without compromising accuracy. Software IP lawyers perceive LicenseGPT as a valuable supplementary tool that enhances efficiency while acknowledging the need for human oversight in complex cases. Our work underscores the potential of specialized AI tools in legal practice and offers a publicly available resource for practitioners and researchers.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2024.
Builds on
21 of 80 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,026
- 2022GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Modelcited by 837
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 328
- 2023Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpacacited by 302
- 2022PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Promptscited by 288
- 2023The CoT Collection: Improving Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning of Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Fine-Tuningcited by 106
- 2023The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AIcited by 73
9 more
- 2023Lawyer LLaMA Technical Reportcited by 54
- 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
- 2018The Impact of Automated Parameter Optimization on Defect Prediction Modelscited by 36
- 2019Towards Standardization of Data Licenses: The Montreal Data Licensecited by 19
- 2019Towards Traceability in Data Ecosystems using a Bill of Materials Modelcited by 12
- 2024Rethinking Software Engineering in the Foundation Model Era: From Task-Driven AI Copilots to Goal-Driven AI Pair Programmerscited by 11
- 2024Legal Documents Drafting with Fine-Tuned Pre-Trained Large Language Modelcited by 5
- 2023Scaling Evidence-based Instructional Design Expertise through Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2023Objectives and Key Results in Software Teams: Challenges, Opportunities and Impact on Developmentcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.