mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On dataset transferability in medical image classification

arXiv 2412.20172 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current transferability estimation methods designed for natural image datasets are often suboptimal in medical image classification. These methods primarily focus on estimating the suitability of pre-trained source model features for a target dataset, which can lead to unrealistic predictions, such as suggesting that the target dataset is the best source for itself. To address this, we propose a novel transferability metric that combines feature quality with gradients to evaluate both the suitability and adaptability of source model features for target tasks. We evaluate our approach in two new scenarios: source dataset transferability for medical image classification and cross-domain transferability. Our results show that our method outperforms existing transferability metrics in both settings. We also provide insight into the factors influencing transfer performance in medical image classification, as well as the dynamics of cross-domain transfer from natural to medical images. Additionally, we provide ground-truth transfer performance benchmarking results to encourage further research into transferability estimation for medical image classification. Our code and experiments are available at https://github.com/DovileDo/transferability-in-medical-imaging.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2024.

Builds on

3 of 59 references.

References · 3

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2020Rethinking the Hyperparameters for Fine-tuningcited by 69
  3. 2020PyTorch Metric Learningcited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.