Data-driven tool wear prediction in milling, based on a process-integrated single-sensor approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate tool wear prediction is essential for maintaining productivity and minimizing costs in machining. However, the complex nature of the tool wear process poses significant challenges to achieving reliable predictions. This study explores data-driven methods, in particular deep learning, for tool wear prediction. Traditional data-driven approaches often focus on a single process, relying on multi-sensor setups and extensive data generation, which limits generalization to new settings. Moreover, multi-sensor integration is often impractical in industrial environments. To address these limitations, this research investigates the transferability of predictive models using minimal training data, validated across two processes. Furthermore, it uses a simple setup with a single acceleration sensor to establish a low-cost data generation approach that facilitates the generalization of models to other processes via transfer learning. The study evaluates several machine learning models, including transformer-inspired convolutional neural networks (CNN), long short-term memory networks (LSTM), support vector machines (SVM), and decision trees, trained on different input formats such as feature vectors and short-time Fourier transform (STFT). The performance of the models is evaluated on two machines and on different amounts of training data, including scenarios with significantly reduced datasets, providing insight into their effectiveness under constrained data conditions. The results demonstrate the potential of specific models and configurations for effective tool wear prediction, contributing to the development of more adaptable and efficient predictive maintenance strategies in machining. Notably, the ConvNeXt model has an exceptional performance, achieving 99.1% accuracy in identifying tool wear using data from only four milling tools operated until they are worn.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2024.
Builds on
8 of 61 references.
References · 8
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2023A survey of the Vision Transformers and their CNN-Transformer based Variantscited by 33
- 2023Understanding Why ViT Trains Badly on Small Datasets: An Intuitive Perspectivecited by 28
- 2024Exploring the Synergies of Hybrid CNNs and ViTs Architectures for Computer Vision: A surveycited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.