Reconstruction Target Matters in Masked Image Modeling for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning (CDFSL) requires the model to transfer knowledge from the data-abundant source domain to data-scarce target domains for fast adaptation, where the large domain gap makes CDFSL a challenging problem. Masked Autoencoder (MAE) excels in effectively using unlabeled data and learning image's global structures, enhancing model generalization and robustness. However, in the CDFSL task with significant domain shifts, we find MAE even shows lower performance than the baseline supervised models. In this paper, we first delve into this phenomenon for an interpretation. We find that MAE tends to focus on low-level domain information during reconstructing pixels while changing the reconstruction target to token features could mitigate this problem. However, not all features are beneficial, as we then find reconstructing high-level features can hardly improve the model's transferability, indicating a trade-off between filtering domain information and preserving the image's global structure. In all, the reconstruction target matters for the CDFSL task. Based on the above findings and interpretations, we further propose Domain-Agnostic Masked Image Modeling (DAMIM) for the CDFSL task. DAMIM includes an Aggregated Feature Reconstruction module to automatically aggregate features for reconstruction, with balanced learning of domain-agnostic information and images' global structure, and a Lightweight Decoder module to further benefit the encoder's generalizability. Experiments on four CDFSL datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2024.
Builds on
0 of 12 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 6.
9 papers.
- 2025Revisiting Pool-based Prompt Learning for Few-shot Class-incremental Learningcited by 8
- 2025Random Registers for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learningcited by 4
- 2026Interpretable Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning with Rectified Target-Domain Local Alignmentcited by 4
- 2025Revisiting Continuity of Image Tokens for Cross-domain Few-shot Learningcited by 3
- 2026Addressing Exacerbated Attention Sink for Source-Free Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learningcited by 2
- 2026Reviving In-domain Fine-tuning Methods for Source-Free Cross-domain Few-shot Learningcited by 1
- 2026Improving CLIP Adaptation by Breaking Tail Alignment for Source-Free Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learningcited by 1
- 2026SRasP: Self-Reorientation Adversarial Style Perturbation for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learningcited by 0
- 2026When Semantics Saturate or Emerge: Adaptation-Conditional Semantic Utility in Source-Free Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learningcited by 0
- 2026When Semantics Saturate or Emerge: Adaptation-Conditional Semantic Utility in Source-Free Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning7 Aug 2026
- 2026Improving CLIP Adaptation by Breaking Tail Alignment for Source-Free Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning28 May 2026
- 2026Addressing Exacerbated Attention Sink for Source-Free Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning25 May 2026
- 2026Reviving In-domain Fine-tuning Methods for Source-Free Cross-domain Few-shot Learning12 May 2026
- 2026Interpretable Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning with Rectified Target-Domain Local Alignment18 Mar 2026
- 2026SRasP: Self-Reorientation Adversarial Style Perturbation for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning5 Mar 2026
- 2025Revisiting Pool-based Prompt Learning for Few-shot Class-incremental Learning12 Jul 2025
- 2025Revisiting Continuity of Image Tokens for Cross-domain Few-shot Learning3 Jun 2025
- 2025Random Registers for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning3 Jun 2025