Evaluating deep learning models for fault diagnosis of a rotating machinery with epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty-aware deep learning (DL) models recently gained attention in fault diagnosis as a way to promote the reliable detection of faults when out-of-distribution (OOD) data arise from unseen faults (epistemic uncertainty) or the presence of noise (aleatoric uncertainty). In this paper, we present the first comprehensive comparative study of state-of-the-art uncertainty-aware DL architectures for fault diagnosis in rotating machinery, where different scenarios affected by epistemic uncertainty and different types of aleatoric uncertainty are investigated. The selected architectures include sampling by dropout, Bayesian neural networks, and deep ensembles. Moreover, to distinguish between in-distribution and OOD data in the different scenarios two uncertainty thresholds, one of which is introduced in this paper, are alternatively applied. Our empirical findings offer guidance to practitioners and researchers who have to deploy real-world uncertainty-aware fault diagnosis systems. In particular, they reveal that, in the presence of epistemic uncertainty, all DL models are capable of effectively detecting, on average, a substantial portion of OOD data across all the scenarios. However, deep ensemble models show superior performance, independently of the uncertainty threshold used for discrimination. In the presence of aleatoric uncertainty, the noise level plays an important role. Specifically, low noise levels hinder the models' ability to effectively detect OOD data. Even in this case, however, deep ensemble models exhibit a milder degradation in performance, dominating the others. These achievements, combined with their shorter inference time, make deep ensemble architectures the preferred choice.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2024.
Builds on
13 of 58 references.
References · 13
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
- 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
- 2015Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks with Bernoulli Approximate Variational Inferencecited by 159
- 2019Maximizing Overall Diversity for Improved Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Ensemblescited by 30
- 2018Spatial Uncertainty Sampling for End-to-End Controlcited by 13
- 2019Fault Detection and Identification using Bayesian Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2019The MBPEP: a deep ensemble pruning algorithm providing high quality uncertainty predictioncited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.