FameBias: Embedding Manipulation Bias Attack in Text-to-Image Models
On the map: Diffusion models → Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion models have rapidly advanced, enabling the generation of high-quality images that align closely with textual descriptions. However, this progress has also raised concerns about their misuse for propaganda and other malicious activities. Recent studies reveal that attackers can embed biases into these models through simple fine-tuning, causing them to generate targeted imagery when triggered by specific phrases. This underscores the potential for T2I models to act as tools for disseminating propaganda, producing images aligned with an attacker's objective for end-users. Building on this concept, we introduce FameBias, a T2I biasing attack that manipulates the embeddings of input prompts to generate images featuring specific public figures. Unlike prior methods, Famebias operates solely on the input embedding vectors without requiring additional model training. We evaluate FameBias comprehensively using Stable Diffusion V2, generating a large corpus of images based on various trigger nouns and target public figures. Our experiments demonstrate that FameBias achieves a high attack success rate while preserving the semantic context of the original prompts across multiple trigger-target pairs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2024.
Builds on
10 of 20 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Reliable and Efficient Concept Erasure of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models17 Jul
- 2024Backdooring Bias (B2) into Stable Diffusion Models21 Jun
- 2024R.A.C.E.: Robust Adversarial Concept Erasure for Secure Text-to-Image Diffusion Model25 May
- 2024Unlearning Concepts in Diffusion Model via Concept Domain Correction and Concept Preserving Gradient24 May
- 2024Defensive Unlearning with Adversarial Training for Robust Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models24 May
- 2024Erasing Concepts from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Few-shot Unlearning12 May
- 2024UnlearnCanvas: Stylized Image Dataset for Enhanced Machine Unlearning Evaluation in Diffusion Models19 Feb
- 2023Forget-Me-Not: Learning to Forget in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models30 Mar
Other references · 2
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2024Get What You Want, Not What You Don't: Image Content Suppression for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 62
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AutoDebias: Automated Framework for Debiasing Text-to-Image Models
- 2025Implicit Bias Injection Attacks against Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2023Evaluating the Robustness of Text-to-image Diffusion Models against Real-world Attacks
- 2024Defending Text-to-image Diffusion Models: Surprising Efficacy of Textual Perturbations Against Backdoor Attacks
- 2025Practical, Generalizable and Robust Backdoor Attacks on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2024Jailbreaking Prompt Attack: A Controllable Adversarial Attack against Diffusion Models
- 2025Towards Effective Prompt Stealing Attack against Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2023Anti-DreamBooth: Protecting users from personalized text-to-image synthesis