Fair Knowledge Tracing in Second Language Acquisition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In second-language acquisition, predictive modeling aids educators in implementing diverse teaching strategies, attracting significant research attention. However, while model accuracy is widely explored, model fairness remains under-examined. Model fairness ensures equitable treatment of groups, preventing unintentional biases based on attributes such as gender, ethnicity, or economic background. A fair model should produce impartial outcomes that do not systematically disadvantage any group. This study evaluates the fairness of two predictive models using the Duolingo dataset's enes (English learners speaking Spanish), esen (Spanish learners speaking English), and fren (French learners speaking English) tracks. We analyze: 1. Algorithmic fairness across platforms (iOS, Android, Web). 2. Algorithmic fairness between developed and developing countries. Key findings include: 1. Deep learning outperforms machine learning in second-language knowledge tracing due to improved accuracy and fairness. 2. Both models favor mobile users over non-mobile users. 3. Machine learning exhibits stronger bias against developing countries compared to deep learning. 4. Deep learning strikes a better balance of fairness and accuracy in the enes and esen tracks, while machine learning is more suitable for fren. This study highlights the importance of addressing fairness in predictive models to ensure equitable educational strategies across platforms and regions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2024.
Builds on
4 of 35 references.
References · 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.