mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are audio DeepFake detection models polyglots?

arXiv 2412.17924 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2024cs.SD eess.AScited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since the majority of audio DeepFake (DF) detection methods are trained on English-centric datasets, their applicability to non-English languages remains largely unexplored. In this work, we present a benchmark for the multilingual audio DF detection challenge by evaluating various adaptation strategies. Our experiments focus on analyzing models trained on English benchmark datasets, as well as intra-linguistic (same-language) and cross-linguistic adaptation approaches. Our results indicate considerable variations in detection efficacy, highlighting the difficulties of multilingual settings. We show that limiting the dataset to English negatively impacts the efficacy, while stressing the importance of the data in the target language.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.