mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Emerging Security Challenges of Large Language Models

arXiv 2412.17614 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved record adoption in a short period of time across many different sectors including high importance areas such as education [4] and healthcare [23]. LLMs are open-ended models trained on diverse data without being tailored for specific downstream tasks, enabling broad applicability across various domains. They are commonly used for text generation, but also widely used to assist with code generation [3], and even analysis of security information, as Microsoft Security Copilot demonstrates [18]. Traditional Machine Learning (ML) models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks [9]. So the concerns on the potential security implications of such wide scale adoption of LLMs have led to the creation of this working group on the security of LLMs. During the Dagstuhl seminar on "Network Attack Detection and Defense - AI-Powered Threats and Responses", the working group discussions focused on the vulnerability of LLMs to adversarial attacks, rather than their potential use in generating malware or enabling cyberattacks. Although we note the potential threat represented by the latter, the role of the LLMs in such uses is mostly as an accelerator for development, similar to what it is in benign use. To make the analysis more specific, the working group employed ChatGPT as a concrete example of an LLM and addressed the following points, which also form the structure of this report: 1. How do LLMs differ in vulnerabilities from traditional ML models? 2. What are the attack objectives in LLMs? 3. How complex it is to assess the risks posed by the vulnerabilities of LLMs? 4. What is the supply chain in LLMs, how data flow in and out of systems and what are the security implications? We conclude with an overview of open challenges and outlook.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2024.

Builds on

16 of 42 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  4. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  5. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  6. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
  7. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
  8. 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
  9. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  10. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
  11. 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 366
  12. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
4 more
  1. 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 254
  2. 2023Large Language Models for Code: Security Hardening and Adversarial Testingcited by 149
  3. 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 130
  4. 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoningcited by 93

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.