mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leveraging Cardiovascular Simulations for In-Vivo Prediction of Cardiac Biomarkers

arXiv 2412.17542 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.CE physics.bio-phcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Whole-body hemodynamics simulators, which model blood flow and pressure waveforms as functions of physiological parameters, are now essential tools for studying cardiovascular systems. However, solving the corresponding inverse problem of mapping observations (e.g., arterial pressure waveforms at specific locations in the arterial network) back to plausible physiological parameters remains challenging. Leveraging recent advances in simulation-based inference, we cast this problem as statistical inference by training an amortized neural posterior estimator on a newly built large dataset of cardiac simulations that we publicly release. To better align simulated data with real-world measurements, we incorporate stochastic elements modeling exogenous effects. The proposed framework can further integrate in-vivo data sources to refine its predictive capabilities on real-world data. In silico, we demonstrate that the proposed framework enables finely quantifying uncertainty associated with individual measurements, allowing trustworthy prediction of four biomarkers of clinical interest--namely Heart Rate, Cardiac Output, Systemic Vascular Resistance, and Left Ventricular Ejection Time--from arterial pressure waveforms and photoplethysmograms. Furthermore, we validate the framework in vivo, where our method accurately captures temporal trends in CO and SVR monitoring on the VitalDB dataset. Finally, the predictive error made by the model monotonically increases with the predicted uncertainty, thereby directly supporting the automatic rejection of unusable measurements.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2024.

Builds on

11 of 67 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  4. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  5. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
  6. 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 502
  7. 2017Flexible statistical inference for mechanistic models of neural dynamicscited by 163
  8. 2015Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifierscited by 90
  9. 2020Graphical Normalizing Flowscited by 37
  10. 2020Neural Empirical Bayes: Source Distribution Estimation and its Applications to Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 21
  11. 2020You say Normalizing Flows I see Bayesian Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.