mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Green Can AI Be? A Study of Trends in Machine Learning Environmental Impacts

arXiv 2412.17376 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The compute requirements associated with training Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have increased exponentially over time. Optimisation strategies aim to reduce the energy consumption and environmental impacts associated with AI, possibly shifting impacts from the use phase to the manufacturing phase in the life-cycle of hardware. This paper investigates the evolution of individual graphics cards production impacts and of the environmental impacts associated with training Machine Learning (ML) models over time. We collect information on graphics cards used to train ML models and released between 2013 and 2023. We assess the environmental impacts associated with the production of each card to visualize the trends on the same period. Then, using information on notable AI systems from the Epoch AI dataset we assess the environmental impacts associated with training each system. The environmental impacts of graphics cards production have increased continuously. The energy consumption and environmental impacts associated with training models have increased exponentially, even when considering reduction strategies such as location shifting to places with less carbon intensive electricity mixes. These results suggest that current impact reduction strategies cannot curb the growth in the environmental impacts of AI. This is consistent with rebound effect, where the efficiency increases fuel the creation of even larger models thereby cancelling the potential impact reduction. Furthermore, these results highlight the importance of considering the impacts of hardware over the entire life-cycle rather than the sole usage phase in order to avoid impact shifting. The environmental impact of AI cannot be reduced without reducing AI activities as well as increasing efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2024.

Builds on

10 of 35 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
  2. 2019Green AIcited by 627
  3. 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 265
  4. 2020The Computational Limits of Deep Learningcited by 193
  5. 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 184
  6. 2022Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learningcited by 163
  7. 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
  8. 2020Chasing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computingcited by 72
  9. 2023How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and reviewcited by 34
  10. 2022From Silicon Shield to Carbon Lock-in ? The Environmental Footprint of Electronic Components Manufacturing in Taiwan (2015-2020)cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.