mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Emerging Microelectronic Materials by Design: Navigating Combinatorial Design Space with Scarce and Dispersed Data

arXiv 2412.17283 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2024cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.CE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing demands of sustainable energy, electronics, and biomedical applications call for next-generation functional materials with unprecedented properties. Of particular interest are emerging materials that display exceptional physical properties, making them promising candidates in energy-efficient microelectronic devices. As the conventional Edisonian approach becomes significantly outpaced by growing societal needs, emerging computational modeling and machine learning (ML) methods are employed for the rational design of materials. However, the complex physical mechanisms, cost of first-principles calculations, and the dispersity and scarcity of data pose challenges to both physics-based and data-driven materials modeling. Moreover, the combinatorial composition-structure design space is high-dimensional and often disjoint, making design optimization nontrivial. In this Account, we review a team effort toward establishing a framework that integrates data-driven and physics-based methods to address these challenges and accelerate materials design. We begin by presenting our integrated materials design framework and its three components in a general context. We then provide an example of applying this materials design framework to metal-insulator transition (MIT) materials, a specific type of emerging materials with practical importance in next-generation memory technologies. We identify multiple new materials which may display this property and propose pathways for their synthesis. Finally, we identify some outstanding challenges in data-driven materials design, such as materials data quality issues and property-performance mismatch. We seek to raise awareness of these overlooked issues hindering materials design, thus stimulating efforts toward developing methods to mitigate the gaps.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2024.

Builds on

15 of 61 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 383
  3. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 213
  4. 2023The Impact of Large Language Models on Scientific Discovery: a Preliminary Study using GPT-4cited by 112
  5. 2019Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design with Mixed Quantitative and Qualitative Variablescited by 66
  6. 2018A Latent Variable Approach to Gaussian Process Modeling with Qualitative and Quantitative Factorscited by 30
  7. 2024From Words to Molecules: A Survey of Large Language Models in Chemistrycited by 14
  8. 2018Accelerating Materials Development via Automation, Machine Learning, and High-Performance Computingcited by 11
  9. 2021Scalable Gaussian Processes for Data-Driven Design using Big Data with Categorical Factorscited by 11
  10. 2023A Latent Variable Approach for Non-Hierarchical Multi-Fidelity Adaptive Samplingcited by 10
  11. 2023Rapid Design of Top-Performing Metal-Organic Frameworks with Qualitative Representations of Building Blockscited by 8
  12. 2021Materials Representation and Transfer Learning for Multi-Property Predictioncited by 7
3 more
  1. 2022Uncertainty-Aware Mixed-Variable Machine Learning for Materials Designcited by 6
  2. 2022ET-AL: Entropy-Targeted Active Learning for Bias Mitigation in Materials Datacited by 6
  3. 2022Fully Bayesian inference for latent variable Gaussian process modelscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.