Where Did Your Model Learn That? Label-free Influence for Self-supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised learning (SSL) has revolutionized learning from large-scale unlabeled datasets, yet the intrinsic relationship between pretraining data and the learned representations remains poorly understood. Traditional supervised learning benefits from gradient-based data attribution tools like influence functions that measure the contribution of an individual data point to model predictions. However, existing definitions of influence rely on labels, making them unsuitable for SSL settings. We address this gap by introducing Influence-SSL, a novel and label-free approach for defining influence functions tailored to SSL. Our method harnesses the stability of learned representations against data augmentations to identify training examples that help explain model predictions. We provide both theoretical foundations and empirical evidence to show the utility of Influence-SSL in analyzing pre-trained SSL models. Our analysis reveals notable differences in how SSL models respond to influential data compared to supervised models. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of Influence-SSL through applications in duplicate detection, outlier identification and fairness analysis. Code is available at: urlhttps://github.com/cryptonymous9/Influence-SSL.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2024.
Builds on
23 of 34 references.
References · 23
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
11 more
- 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
- 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 146
- 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 142
- 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 134
- 2022Chaos is a Ladder: A New Theoretical Understanding of Contrastive Learning via Augmentation Overlapcited by 105
- 2021Towards the Generalization of Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 99
- 2024What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functionscited by 88
- 2022How Mask Matters: Towards Theoretical Understandings of Masked Autoencoderscited by 86
- 2019On Second-Order Group Influence Functions for Black-Box Predictionscited by 78
- 2023Simfluence: Modeling the Influence of Individual Training Examples by Simulating Training Runscited by 52
- 2021Rethinking Influence Functions of Neural Networks in the Over-parameterized Regimecited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.