mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Making Transparency Advocates: An Educational Approach Towards Better Algorithmic Transparency in Practice

arXiv 2412.15363 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concerns about the risks and harms posed by artificial intelligence (AI) have resulted in significant study into algorithmic transparency, giving rise to a sub-field known as Explainable AI (XAI). Unfortunately, despite a decade of development in XAI, an existential challenge remains: progress in research has not been fully translated into the actual implementation of algorithmic transparency by organizations. In this work, we test an approach for addressing the challenge by creating transparency advocates, or motivated individuals within organizations who drive a ground-up cultural shift towards improved algorithmic transparency. Over several years, we created an open-source educational workshop on algorithmic transparency and advocacy. We delivered the workshop to professionals across two separate domains to improve their algorithmic transparency literacy and willingness to advocate for change. In the weeks following the workshop, participants applied what they learned, such as speaking up for algorithmic transparency at an organization-wide AI strategy meeting. We also make two broader observations: first, advocacy is not a monolith and can be broken down into different levels. Second, individuals' willingness for advocacy is affected by their professional field. For example, news and media professionals may be more likely to advocate for algorithmic transparency than those working at technology start-ups.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.

Builds on

10 of 43 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  4. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
  5. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  6. 2019Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelinescited by 107
  7. 2019Measuring the Quality of Explanations: The System Causability Scale (SCS). Comparing Human and Machine Explanationscited by 64
  8. 2021Towards Accountability in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Public Administrationscited by 12
  9. 2022Pathways through Conspiracy: The Evolution of Conspiracy Radicalization through Engagement in Online Conspiracy Discussionscited by 8
  10. 2019Teaching Responsible Data Science: Charting New Pedagogical Territorycited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.