Generative AI for Banks: Benchmarks and Algorithms for Synthetic Financial Transaction Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The banking sector faces challenges in using deep learning due to data sensitivity and regulatory constraints, but generative AI may offer a solution. Thus, this study identifies effective algorithms for generating synthetic financial transaction data and evaluates five leading models - Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGAN), DoppelGANger (DGAN), Wasserstein GAN, Financial Diffusion (FinDiff), and Tabular Variational AutoEncoders (TVAE) - across five criteria: fidelity, synthesis quality, efficiency, privacy, and graph structure. While none of the algorithms is able to replicate the real data's graph structure, each excels in specific areas: DGAN is ideal for privacy-sensitive tasks, FinDiff and TVAE excel in data replication and augmentation, and CTGAN achieves a balance across all five criteria, making it suitable for general applications with moderate privacy concerns. As a result, our findings offer valuable insights for choosing the most suitable algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 2 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.
Builds on
0 of 2 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.