mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generative AI for Banks: Benchmarks and Algorithms for Synthetic Financial Transaction Data

arXiv 2412.14730 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The banking sector faces challenges in using deep learning due to data sensitivity and regulatory constraints, but generative AI may offer a solution. Thus, this study identifies effective algorithms for generating synthetic financial transaction data and evaluates five leading models - Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGAN), DoppelGANger (DGAN), Wasserstein GAN, Financial Diffusion (FinDiff), and Tabular Variational AutoEncoders (TVAE) - across five criteria: fidelity, synthesis quality, efficiency, privacy, and graph structure. While none of the algorithms is able to replicate the real data's graph structure, each excels in specific areas: DGAN is ideal for privacy-sensitive tasks, FinDiff and TVAE excel in data replication and augmentation, and CTGAN achieves a balance across all five criteria, making it suitable for general applications with moderate privacy concerns. As a result, our findings offer valuable insights for choosing the most suitable algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 2 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 2 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.