Sliding Windows Are Not the End: Exploring Full Ranking with Long-Context Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exciting performance in listwise passage ranking. Due to the limited input length, existing methods often adopt the sliding window strategy. Such a strategy, though effective, is inefficient as it involves repetitive and serialized processing, which usually re-evaluates relevant passages multiple times. As a result, it incurs redundant API costs, which are proportional to the number of inference tokens. The development of long-context LLMs enables the full ranking of all passages within a single inference, avoiding redundant API costs. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study of long-context LLMs for ranking tasks in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Surprisingly, our experiments reveal that full ranking with long-context LLMs can deliver superior performance in the supervised fine-tuning setting with a huge efficiency improvement. Furthermore, we identify two limitations of fine-tuning the full ranking model based on existing methods: (1) sliding window strategy fails to produce a full ranking list as a training label, and (2) the language modeling loss cannot emphasize top-ranked passage IDs in the label. To alleviate these issues, we propose a new complete listwise label construction approach and a novel importance-aware learning objective for full ranking. Experiments show the superior performance of our method over baselines. Our codes are available at urlhttps://github.com/8421BCD/fullrank.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025Query-Focused Retrieval Heads Improve Long-Context Reasoning and Re-rankingcited by 30
- 2025Towards AI Search Paradigmcited by 19
- 2026Agentic-R: Learning to Retrieve for Agentic Searchcited by 10
- 2025CoRank: LLM-Based Compact Reranking with Document Features for Scientific Retrievalcited by 5
- 2025Benchmarking Chinese Medical LLMs: A Medbench-based Analysis of Performance Gaps and Hierarchical Optimization Strategiescited by 2
- 2026Beyond Relevance-Centric Retrieval: Rubric-Oriented Document Set Selection and Rankingcited by 2
- 2026Can LLM Rerankers Predict Their Own Ranking Performance?cited by 1
- 2026ResRank: Unifying Retrieval and Listwise Reranking via End-to-End Joint Training with Residual Passage Compressioncited by 0
- 2026Beyond Relevance-Centric Retrieval: Rubric-Oriented Document Set Selection and Ranking22 Jul 2026
- 2026Can LLM Rerankers Predict Their Own Ranking Performance?2 Jun 2026
- 2026ResRank: Unifying Retrieval and Listwise Reranking via End-to-End Joint Training with Residual Passage Compression24 Apr 2026
- 2026Agentic-R: Learning to Retrieve for Agentic Search17 Jan 2026
- 2025Towards AI Search Paradigm20 Jun 2025
- 2025Query-Focused Retrieval Heads Improve Long-Context Reasoning and Re-ranking11 Jun 2025
- 2025CoRank: LLM-Based Compact Reranking with Document Features for Scientific Retrieval19 May 2025
- 2025Benchmarking Chinese Medical LLMs: A Medbench-based Analysis of Performance Gaps and Hierarchical Optimization Strategies10 Mar 2025