mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Integrating Evidence into the Design of XAI and AI-based Decision Support Systems: A Means-End Framework for End-users in Construction

arXiv 2412.14209 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable Artificial Intelligence seeks to make the reasoning processes of AI models transparent and interpretable, particularly in complex decision making environments. In the construction industry, where AI based decision support systems are increasingly adopted, limited attention has been paid to the integration of supporting evidence that underpins the reliability and accountability of AI generated outputs. The absence of such evidence undermines the validity of explanations and the trustworthiness of system recommendations. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a theoretical, evidence based means end framework developed through a narrative review. The framework offers an epistemic foundation for designing XAI enabled DSS that generate meaningful explanations tailored to users knowledge needs and decision contexts. It focuses on evaluating the strength, relevance, and utility of different types of evidence supporting AI generated explanations. While developed with construction professionals as primary end users, the framework is also applicable to developers, regulators, and project managers with varying epistemic goals.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Ethical Compass of the Machine: Evaluating Large Language Models for Decision Support in Construction Project Management
  2. 2023In Search of Verifiability: Explanations Rarely Enable Complementary Performance in AI-Advised Decision Making
  3. 2026Can AI Reason Like an Urban Planner? Benchmarking Large Language Models Against Professional Judgment
  4. 2026Position: Explainability Research Must Prioritize Foundations over Ad-hoc Methods
  5. 2024Generative AI in the Construction Industry: A State-of-the-art Analysis
  6. 2025The Engineer's Dilemma: A Review of Establishing a Legal Framework for Integrating Machine Learning in Construction by Navigating Precedents and Industry Expectations
  7. 2026Evidence-Driven Reasoning for Industrial Maintenance Using Heterogeneous Data
  8. 2026Addressing the Selection Problem in Explainable AI