On consistent estimation of dimension values
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of estimating, from a random sample of points, the dimension of a compact subset S of the Euclidean space is considered. The emphasis is put on consistency results in the statistical sense. That is, statements of convergence to the true dimension value when the sample size grows to infinity. Among the many available definitions of dimension, we have focused (on the grounds of its statistical tractability) on three notions: the Minkowski dimension, the correlation dimension and the, perhaps less popular, concept of pointwise dimension. We prove the statistical consistency of some natural estimators of these quantities. Our proofs partially rely on the use of an instrumental estimator formulated in terms of the empirical volume function Vn(r), defined as the Lebesgue measure of the set of points whose distance to the sample is at most r. In particular, we explore the case in which the true volume function V(r) of the target set S is a polynomial on some interval starting at zero. An empirical study is also included. Our study aims to provide some theoretical support, and some practical insights, for the problem of deciding whether or not the set S has a dimension smaller than that of the ambient space. This is a major statistical motivation of the dimension studies, in connection with the so-called ``Manifold Hypothesis''.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2024.
Builds on
4 of 37 references.
References · 4
- 2021Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Using Wasserstein Distancescited by 20
- 2016Minimax Rates for Estimating the Dimension of a Manifoldcited by 10
- 2020Rdimtools: An R package for Dimension Reduction and Intrinsic Dimension Estimationcited by 5
- 2023On the notion of polynomial reach: a statistical applicationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.