Identifying Bias in Deep Neural Networks Using Image Transforms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
CNNs have become one of the most commonly used computational tool in the past two decades. One of the primary downsides of CNNs is that they work as a ``black box", where the user cannot necessarily know how the image data are analyzed, and therefore needs to rely on empirical evaluation to test the efficacy of a trained CNN. This can lead to hidden biases that affect the performance evaluation of neural networks, but are difficult to identify. Here we discuss examples of such hidden biases in common and widely used benchmark datasets, and propose techniques for identifying dataset biases that can affect the standard performance evaluation metrics. One effective approach to identify dataset bias is to perform image classification by using merely blank background parts of the original images. However, in some situations a blank background in the images is not available, making it more difficult to separate foreground or contextual information from the bias. To overcome this, we propose a method to identify dataset bias without the need to crop background information from the images. That method is based on applying several image transforms to the original images, including Fourier transform, wavelet transforms, median filter, and their combinations. These transforms were applied to recover background bias information that CNNs use to classify images. This transformations affect the contextual visual information in a different manner than it affects the systemic background bias. Therefore, the method can distinguish between contextual information and the bias, and alert on the presence of background bias even without the need to separate sub-images parts from the blank background of the original images. Code used in the experiments is publicly available.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.
Builds on
4 of 21 references.
References · 4
- 2019Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 93
- 2020Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Studycited by 86
- 2022Avoiding Overfitting: A Survey on Regularization Methods for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 55
- 2022Systematic biases when using deep neural networks for annotating large catalogs of astronomical imagescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Explainable Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Brain Tumor and Pneumonia Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Galaxy image simplification using Generative AIcited by 1
- 2026Unmasking Biases and Reliability Concerns in Convolutional Neural Networks Analysis of Cancer Pathology Imagescited by 1
- 2025Fourier-Based GAN Fingerprint Detection using ResNet50cited by 0
- 2025Wavelet-based GAN Fingerprint Detection using ResNet50cited by 0
- 2026AI-Driven Cybersecurity Threats: A Survey of Emerging Risks and Defensive Strategiescited by 0
- 2026Unmasking Biases and Reliability Concerns in Convolutional Neural Networks Analysis of Cancer Pathology Images12 Mar 2026
- 2026AI-Driven Cybersecurity Threats: A Survey of Emerging Risks and Defensive Strategies6 Jan 2026
- 2025Explainable Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Brain Tumor and Pneumonia Detection21 Oct 2025
- 2025Wavelet-based GAN Fingerprint Detection using ResNet5021 Oct 2025
- 2025Fourier-Based GAN Fingerprint Detection using ResNet5018 Oct 2025
- 2025Galaxy image simplification using Generative AI15 Jul 2025