Dual Interpretation of Machine Learning Forecasts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning predictions are typically interpreted as the sum of contributions of predictors. Yet, each out-of-sample prediction can also be expressed as a linear combination of in-sample values of the predicted variable, with weights corresponding to pairwise proximity scores between current and past economic events. While this dual route leads nowhere in some contexts (e.g., large cross-sectional datasets), it provides sparser interpretations in settings with many regressors and little training data-like macroeconomic forecasting. In this case, the sequence of contributions can be visualized as a time series, allowing analysts to explain predictions as quantifiable combinations of historical analogies. Moreover, the weights can be viewed as those of a data portfolio, inspiring new diagnostic measures such as forecast concentration, short position, and turnover. We show how weights can be retrieved seamlessly for (kernel) ridge regression, random forest, boosted trees, and neural networks. Then, we apply these tools to analyze post-pandemic forecasts of inflation, GDP growth, and recession probabilities. In all cases, the approach opens the black box from a new angle and demonstrates how machine learning models leverage history partly repeating itself.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Ordinary Least Squares as an Attention Mechanismcited by 0
- 2026Quantifying the Risk-Return Tradeoff in Forecastingcited by 0
- 2026LGB+: A Macroeconomic Forecasting Road Testcited by 0
- 2026LGB+: A Macroeconomic Forecasting Road Test10 May 2026
- 2026Quantifying the Risk-Return Tradeoff in Forecasting10 May 2026
- 2025Ordinary Least Squares as an Attention Mechanism13 Apr 2025