Are the Latent Representations of Foundation Models for Pathology Invariant to Rotation?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised foundation models for digital pathology encode small patches from H&E whole slide images into latent representations used for downstream tasks. However, the invariance of these representations to patch rotation remains unexplored. This study investigates the rotational invariance of latent representations across twelve foundation models by quantifying the alignment between non-rotated and rotated patches using mutual k-nearest neighbours and cosine distance. Models that incorporated rotation augmentation during self-supervised training exhibited significantly greater invariance to rotations. We hypothesise that the absence of rotational inductive bias in the transformer architecture necessitates rotation augmentation during training to achieve learned invariance. Code: https://github.com/MatousE/rot-invariance-analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2026Scanner-Induced Domain Shifts Undermine the Robustness of Pathology Foundation Modelscited by 9
- 2025Beyond the Failures: Rethinking Foundation Models in Pathologycited by 6
- 2025Controllable Latent Space Augmentation for Digital Pathologycited by 2
- 2025Aggregation Schemes for Single-Vector WSI Representation Learning in Digital Pathologycited by 0
- 2026Scanner-Induced Domain Shifts Undermine the Robustness of Pathology Foundation Models7 Jan 2026
- 2025Beyond the Failures: Rethinking Foundation Models in Pathology27 Oct 2025
- 2025Controllable Latent Space Augmentation for Digital Pathology20 Aug 2025
- 2025Aggregation Schemes for Single-Vector WSI Representation Learning in Digital Pathology29 Jan 2025