mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Drawing the Line: Enhancing Trustworthiness of MLLMs Through the Power of Refusal

arXiv 2412.11196 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel at multimodal perception and understanding, yet their tendency to generate hallucinated or inaccurate responses undermines their trustworthiness. Existing methods have largely overlooked the importance of refusal responses as a means of enhancing MLLMs reliability. To bridge this gap, we present the Information Boundary-aware Learning Framework (InBoL), a novel approach that empowers MLLMs to refuse to answer user queries when encountering insufficient information. To the best of our knowledge, InBoL is the first framework that systematically defines the conditions under which refusal is appropriate for MLLMs using the concept of information boundaries proposed in our paper. This framework introduces a comprehensive data generation pipeline and tailored training strategies to improve the model's ability to deliver appropriate refusal responses. To evaluate the trustworthiness of MLLMs, we further propose a user-centric alignment goal along with corresponding metrics. Experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in refusal accuracy without noticeably compromising the model's helpfulness, establishing InBoL as a pivotal advancement in building more trustworthy MLLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 26 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2024.

Builds on

26 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024VITA: Towards Open-Source Interactive Omni Multimodal LLM9 Aug
  2. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer6 Aug
  3. 2024Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study2 Jul
  4. 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs24 Jun
  5. 2024mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Models17 Jun
  6. 2024Assessment of Multimodal Large Language Models in Alignment with Human Values26 Mar
  7. 2024MM1: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Multimodal LLM Pre-training14 Mar
  8. 2024MM-SAP: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Self-Awareness of Multimodal Large Language Models in Perception15 Jan
  9. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF25 Sep
  10. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul

Other references · 16

  1. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
  2. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  3. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
  4. 2023Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 445
  5. 2024Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 388
  6. 2024mPLUG-Owl3: Towards Long Image-Sequence Understanding in Multi-Modal Large Language Modelscited by 291
  7. 2024InternLM-XComposer-2.5: A Versatile Large Vision Language Model Supporting Long-Contextual Input and Outputcited by 195
  8. 2024RLAIF-V: Open-Source AI Feedback Leads to Super GPT-4V Trustworthinesscited by 131
  9. 2023Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Losscited by 108
  10. 2023Alignment for Honestycited by 74
  11. 2024Rejection Improves Reliability: Training LLMs to Refuse Unknown Questions Using RL from Knowledge Feedbackcited by 66
  12. 2024Can AI Assistants Know What They Don't Know?cited by 50
4 more
  1. 2024Learning to Trust Your Feelings: Leveraging Self-awareness in LLMs for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 44
  2. 2024Teaching Large Language Models to Express Knowledge Boundary from Their Own Signalscited by 32
  3. 2024VILA2: VILA Augmented VILAcited by 25
  4. 2024Towards Tracing Trustworthiness Dynamics: Revisiting Pre-training Period of Large Language Modelscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RefusalBench: Generative Evaluation of Selective Refusal in Grounded Language Models
  2. 2026Harnessing Textual Refusal Directions for Multimodal Safety
  3. 2026Do Language Models Know When They'll Refuse? Probing Introspective Awareness of Safety Boundaries
  4. 2026VirtueBench: Evaluating Trustworthiness under Uncertainty in Long Video Understanding
  5. 2024Refusing Safe Prompts for Multi-modal Large Language Models
  6. 2026Refuse without Refusal: A Structural Analysis of Safety-Tuning Responses for Reducing False Refusals in Language Models
  7. 2024Refusal Tokens: A Simple Way to Calibrate Refusals in Large Language Models
  8. 2025LLM Content Moderation and User Satisfaction: Evidence from Response Refusals in Chatbot Arena