Can LLMs Help Create Grammar?: Automating Grammar Creation for Endangered Languages with In-Context Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Yes! In the present-day documenting and preserving endangered languages, the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a promising approach. This paper explores how LLMs, particularly through in-context learning, can assist in generating grammatical information for low-resource languages with limited amount of data. We takes Moklen as a case study to evaluate the efficacy of LLMs in producing coherent grammatical rules and lexical entries using only bilingual dictionaries and parallel sentences of the unknown language without building the model from scratch. Our methodology involves organising the existing linguistic data and prompting to efficiently enable to generate formal XLE grammar. Our results demonstrate that LLMs can successfully capture key grammatical structures and lexical information, although challenges such as the potential for English grammatical biases remain. This study highlights the potential of LLMs to enhance language documentation efforts, providing a cost-effective solution for generating linguistic data and contributing to the preservation of endangered languages.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2024.
Builds on
7 of 30 references.
References · 7
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2023A Benchmark for Learning to Translate a New Language from One Grammar Bookcited by 75
- 2024Reliable, Adaptable, and Attributable Language Models with Retrievalcited by 73
- 2018ROUGE 2.0: Updated and Improved Measures for Evaluation of Summarization Taskscited by 67
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.
8 papers.
- 2025LingGym: How Far Are LLMs from Thinking Like Field Linguists?cited by 6
- 2026Linguistics and Human Brain: A Perspective of Computational Neurosciencecited by 4
- 2025Towards Corpus-Grounded Agentic LLMs for Multilingual Grammatical Analysiscited by 2
- 2026Grammar Engineering Meets LLMs: Development of Cantonese and Irish ParGram Treebankscited by 1
- 2025Advancing Uto-Aztecan Language Technologies: A Case Study on the Endangered Comanche Languagecited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Metalinguistic Knowledge in Large Language Models across the World's Languagescited by 0
- 2026A Factorial Study of Synthetic Data Generation for Low-Resource Machine Translation using Grammar Bookscited by 0
- 2026How Useful are LLMs for Grammar Engineering? Cantonese ParGram Resources and Controlled Experimental Evaluation with English Baselinescited by 0
- 2026How Useful are LLMs for Grammar Engineering? Cantonese ParGram Resources and Controlled Experimental Evaluation with English Baselines24 Aug 2026
- 2026Grammar Engineering Meets LLMs: Development of Cantonese and Irish ParGram Treebanks7 Aug 2026
- 2026A Factorial Study of Synthetic Data Generation for Low-Resource Machine Translation using Grammar Books24 Jul 2026
- 2026Linguistics and Human Brain: A Perspective of Computational Neuroscience9 Feb 2026
- 2026Evaluating Metalinguistic Knowledge in Large Language Models across the World's Languages2 Feb 2026
- 2025Towards Corpus-Grounded Agentic LLMs for Multilingual Grammatical Analysis28 Nov 2025
- 2025LingGym: How Far Are LLMs from Thinking Like Field Linguists?1 Nov 2025
- 2025Advancing Uto-Aztecan Language Technologies: A Case Study on the Endangered Comanche Language10 May 2025