mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Control of Overfitting with Physics

arXiv 2412.10716 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While there are many works on the applications of machine learning, not so many of them are trying to understand the theoretical justifications to explain their efficiency. In this work, overfitting control (or generalization property) in machine learning is explained using analogies from physics and biology. For stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics, we show that the Eyring formula of kinetic theory allows to control overfitting in the algorithmic stability approach - when wide minima of the risk function with low free energy correspond to low overfitting. For the generative adversarial network (GAN) model, we establish an analogy between GAN and the predator-prey model in biology. An application of this analogy allows us to explain the selection of wide likelihood maxima and overfitting reduction for GANs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2024.

Builds on

8 of 43 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  2. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 359
  3. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 326
  4. 2017Gradient descent GAN optimization is locally stablecited by 67
  5. 2023On the Design Fundamentals of Diffusion Models: A Surveycited by 60
  6. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks by Solving Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 21
  7. 2021Towards a Theory of Evolution as Multilevel Learningcited by 18
  8. 2021Functional Space Analysis of Local GAN Convergencecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.