mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Enhancing the Reasoning Capabilities of Small Language Models via Solution Guidance Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2412.09906 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2024cs.CLcited by 11

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks. Advances in prompt engineering and fine-tuning techniques have further enhanced their ability to address complex reasoning challenges. However, these advanced capabilities are often exclusive to models exceeding 100 billion parameters. Although Chain-of-Thought (CoT) fine-tuning methods have been explored for smaller models (under 10 billion parameters), they typically depend on extensive CoT training data, which can introduce inconsistencies and limit effectiveness in low-data settings. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduce a new reasoning strategy Solution Guidance (SG) and a plug-and-play training paradigm Solution-Guidance Fine-Tuning (SGFT) for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of small language models. SG focuses on problem understanding and decomposition at the semantic and logical levels, rather than specific computations, which can effectively improve the SLMs' generalization and reasoning abilities. With only a small amount of SG training data, SGFT can fine-tune a SLM to produce accurate problem-solving guidances, which can then be flexibly fed to any SLM as prompts, enabling it to generate correct answers directly. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the performance of SLMs on various reasoning tasks, enhancing both their practicality and efficiency within resource-constrained environments.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 33 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Climbing the Ladder of Reasoning: What LLMs Can-and Still Can't-Solve after SFT?
  2. 2025CARFT: Boosting LLM Reasoning via Contrastive Learning with Annotated Chain-of-Thought-based Reinforced Fine-Tuning
  3. 2025Rethinking Supervised Fine-Tuning: Emphasizing Key Answer Tokens for Improved LLM Accuracy
  4. 2022Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers
  5. 2026Dual-Phase LLM Reasoning: Self-Evolved Mathematical Frameworks
  6. 2024On the Impact of Fine-Tuning on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  7. 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning
  8. 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning