mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Developing a Dataset-Adaptive, Normalized Metric for Machine Learning Model Assessment: Integrating Size, Complexity, and Class Imbalance

arXiv 2412.07244 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.LOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and precision are frequently used to evaluate machine learning models, however they may not be sufficient for evaluating performance on tiny, unbalanced, or high-dimensional datasets. A dataset-adaptive, normalized metric that incorporates dataset characteristics like size, feature dimensionality, class imbalance, and signal-to-noise ratio is presented in this study. Early insights into the model's performance potential in challenging circumstances are provided by the suggested metric, which offers a scalable and adaptable evaluation framework. The metric's capacity to accurately forecast model scalability and performance is demonstrated via experimental validation spanning classification, regression, and clustering tasks, guaranteeing solid assessments in settings with limited data. This method has important ramifications for effective resource allocation and model optimization in machine learning workflows.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.

Builds on

1 of 10 references.

References · 1

  1. 2020The classification for High-dimension low-sample size datacited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.