Rate-In: Information-Driven Adaptive Dropout Rates for Improved Inference-Time Uncertainty Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate uncertainty estimation is crucial for deploying neural networks in risk-sensitive applications such as medical diagnosis. Monte Carlo Dropout is a widely used technique for approximating predictive uncertainty by performing stochastic forward passes with dropout during inference. However, using static dropout rates across all layers and inputs can lead to suboptimal uncertainty estimates, as it fails to adapt to the varying characteristics of individual inputs and network layers. Existing approaches optimize dropout rates during training using labeled data, resulting in fixed inference-time parameters that cannot adjust to new data distributions, compromising uncertainty estimates in Monte Carlo simulations. In this paper, we propose Rate-In, an algorithm that dynamically adjusts dropout rates during inference by quantifying the information loss induced by dropout in each layer's feature maps. By treating dropout as controlled noise injection and leveraging information-theoretic principles, Rate-In adapts dropout rates per layer and per input instance without requiring ground truth labels. By quantifying the functional information loss in feature maps, we adaptively tune dropout rates to maintain perceptual quality across diverse medical imaging tasks and architectural configurations. Our extensive empirical study on synthetic data and real-world medical imaging tasks demonstrates that Rate-In improves calibration and sharpens uncertainty estimates compared to fixed or heuristic dropout rates without compromising predictive performance. Rate-In offers a practical, unsupervised, inference-time approach to optimizing dropout for more reliable predictive uncertainty estimation in critical applications.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.
Builds on
26 of 51 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 628
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
- 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
- 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
14 more
- 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 163
- 2018Evaluating Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Semantic Segmentationcited by 143
- 2016Information Dropout: Learning Optimal Representations Through Noisy Computationcited by 132
- 2020Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimizationcited by 123
- 2018Bias-Reduced Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Neural Classifierscited by 113
- 2019DropConnect Is Effective in Modeling Uncertainty of Bayesian Deep Networkscited by 92
- 2020Masksembles for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 88
- 2018Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for Batch Normalized Deep Networkscited by 70
- 2019Well-calibrated Model Uncertainty with Temperature Scaling for Dropout Variational Inferencecited by 36
- 2019Training-Free Uncertainty Estimation for Dense Regression: Sensitivity as a Surrogatecited by 28
- 2022Information Flow in Deep Neural Networkscited by 22
- 2024MedMNIST-C: Comprehensive benchmark and improved classifier robustness by simulating realistic image corruptionscited by 17
- 2019Adaptive Estimators Show Information Compression in Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2023Dropout Injection at Test Time for Post Hoc Uncertainty Quantification in Neural Networkscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2025Spatially-Aware Evaluation of Segmentation Uncertaintycited by 6
- 2025Dual-domain Multi-path Self-supervised Diffusion Model for Accelerated MRI Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2025Out-of-Distribution Detection in Molecular Complexes via Diffusion Models for Irregular Graphscited by 0
- 2026Confidence-Uncertainty Boundary Calibration for Bayesian Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 0
- 2026CUPID: A Plug-in Framework for Joint Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Estimation with a Single Modelcited by 0
- 2026Monte Carlo Stochastic Depth for Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2026General Incomplete Multimodal Learning via Dynamic Quality Perceptioncited by 0
- 2026General Incomplete Multimodal Learning via Dynamic Quality Perception8 Jul 2026
- 2026Monte Carlo Stochastic Depth for Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning14 Apr 2026
- 2026CUPID: A Plug-in Framework for Joint Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Estimation with a Single Model11 Mar 2026
- 2026Confidence-Uncertainty Boundary Calibration for Bayesian Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis12 Feb 2026
- 2025Out-of-Distribution Detection in Molecular Complexes via Diffusion Models for Irregular Graphs20 Dec 2025
- 2025Spatially-Aware Evaluation of Segmentation Uncertainty19 Jun 2025
- 2025Dual-domain Multi-path Self-supervised Diffusion Model for Accelerated MRI Reconstruction24 Mar 2025