Applications and Implications of Large Language Models in Qualitative Analysis: A New Frontier for Empirical Software Engineering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The use of large language models (LLMs) for qualitative analysis is gaining attention in various fields, including software engineering, where qualitative methods are essential for understanding human and social factors. This study aimed to investigate how LLMs are currently used in qualitative analysis and their potential applications in software engineering research, focusing on the benefits, limitations, and practices associated with their use. A systematic mapping study was conducted, analyzing 21 relevant studies to explore reported uses of LLMs for qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that LLMs are primarily used for tasks such as coding, thematic analysis, and data categorization, offering benefits like increased efficiency and support for new researchers. However, limitations such as output variability, challenges in capturing nuanced perspectives, and ethical concerns related to privacy and transparency were also identified. The study emphasizes the need for structured strategies and guidelines to optimize LLM use in qualitative research within software engineering, enhancing their effectiveness while addressing ethical considerations. While LLMs show promise in supporting qualitative analysis, human expertise remains crucial for interpreting data, and ongoing exploration of best practices will be vital for their successful integration into empirical software engineering research.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
8 papers.
- 2025LOGOS: LLM-driven End-to-End Grounded Theory Development and Schema Induction for Qualitative Researchcited by 6
- 2026Prompt Engineering Strategies for LLM-based Qualitative Coding of Psychological Safety in Software Engineering Communities: A Controlled Empirical Studycited by 1
- 2025Can machines perform a qualitative data analysis? Reading the debate with Alan Turingcited by 0
- 2026Taking a Pulse on How Generative AI is Reshaping the Software Engineering Research Landscapecited by 0
- 2026CentaurTA Studio: A Self-Improving Human-Agent Collaboration System for Thematic Analysiscited by 0
- 2026To Vibe Research or Not to Vibe Research? Generative AI in Qualitative Researchcited by 0
- 2026Antipatterns in AI-assisted Qualitative Data Analysis: A Catalog of Temptations and Pitfalls for Software Engineering Researcherscited by 0
- 2026How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Codingcited by 0
- 2026How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding10 Sep 2026
- 2026Antipatterns in AI-assisted Qualitative Data Analysis: A Catalog of Temptations and Pitfalls for Software Engineering Researchers28 Aug 2026
- 2026Prompt Engineering Strategies for LLM-based Qualitative Coding of Psychological Safety in Software Engineering Communities: A Controlled Empirical Study8 May 2026
- 2026To Vibe Research or Not to Vibe Research? Generative AI in Qualitative Research30 Apr 2026
- 2026Taking a Pulse on How Generative AI is Reshaping the Software Engineering Research Landscape13 Apr 2026
- 2026CentaurTA Studio: A Self-Improving Human-Agent Collaboration System for Thematic Analysis18 Mar 2026
- 2025Can machines perform a qualitative data analysis? Reading the debate with Alan Turing2 Dec 2025
- 2025LOGOS: LLM-driven End-to-End Grounded Theory Development and Schema Induction for Qualitative Research29 Sep 2025