Integrating Expert Labels into LLM-based Emission Goal Detection: Example Selection vs Automatic Prompt Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address the detection of emission reduction goals in corporate reports, an important task for monitoring companies' progress in addressing climate change. Specifically, we focus on the issue of integrating expert feedback in the form of labeled example passages into LLM-based pipelines, and compare the two strategies of (1) a dynamic selection of few-shot examples and (2) the automatic optimization of the prompt by the LLM itself. Our findings on a public dataset of 769 climate-related passages from real-world business reports indicate that automatic prompt optimization is the superior approach, while combining both methods provides only limited benefit. Qualitative results indicate that optimized prompts do indeed capture many intricacies of the targeted emission goal extraction task.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2024.
Builds on
11 of 23 references.
References · 11
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
- 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 648
- 2022Selective Annotation Makes Language Models Better Few-Shot Learnerscited by 243
- 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 196
- 2024ClimateGPT: Towards AI Synthesizing Interdisciplinary Research on Climate Changecited by 47
- 2024Intent-based Prompt Calibration: Enhancing prompt optimization with synthetic boundary casescited by 13
- 2023Towards Answering Climate Questionnaires from Unstructured Climate Reportscited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.