mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Comparative Study of Learning Paradigms in Large Language Models via Intrinsic Dimension

arXiv 2412.06245 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on natural language tasks can be improved through both supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and in-context learning (ICL), which operate via distinct mechanisms. Supervised fine-tuning updates the model's weights by minimizing loss on training data, whereas in-context learning leverages task demonstrations embedded in the prompt, without changing the model's parameters. This study investigates the effects of these learning paradigms on the hidden representations of LLMs using Intrinsic Dimension (ID). We use ID to estimate the number of degrees of freedom between representations extracted from LLMs as they perform specific natural language tasks. We first explore how the ID of LLM representations evolves during SFT and how it varies due to the number of demonstrations in ICL. We then compare the IDs induced by SFT and ICL and find that ICL consistently induces a higher ID compared to SFT, suggesting that representations generated during ICL reside in higher dimensional manifolds in the embedding space.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2024.

Builds on

21 of 29 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  7. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  8. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  9. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  10. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  11. 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 938
  12. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
9 more
  1. 2022PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Promptscited by 289
  2. 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 282
  3. 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 250
  4. 2022Why Can GPT Learn In-Context? Language Models Implicitly Perform Gradient Descent as Meta-Optimizerscited by 204
  5. 2017Bilateral Multi-Perspective Matching for Natural Language Sentencescited by 121
  6. 2023The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer modelscited by 112
  7. 2024Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with Local Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 45
  8. 2023Bridging Information-Theoretic and Geometric Compression in Language Modelscited by 26
  9. 2024Geometric Signatures of Compositionality Across a Language Model's Lifetimecited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.