mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Conservative Contextual Bandits: Beyond Linear Representations

arXiv 2412.06165 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conservative Contextual Bandits (CCBs) address safety in sequential decision making by requiring that an agent's policy, along with minimizing regret, also satisfies a safety constraint: the performance is not worse than a baseline policy (e.g., the policy that the company has in production) by more than (1+α) factor. Prior work developed UCB-style algorithms in the multi-armed [Wu et al., 2016] and contextual linear [Kazerouni et al., 2017] settings. However, in practice the cost of the arms is often a non-linear function, and therefore existing UCB algorithms are ineffective in such settings. In this paper, we consider CCBs beyond the linear case and develop two algorithms mathttC-SquareCB and mathttC-FastCB, using Inverse Gap Weighting (IGW) based exploration and an online regression oracle. We show that the safety constraint is satisfied with high probability and that the regret of mathttC-SquareCB is sub-linear in horizon T, while the regret of mathttC-FastCB is first-order and is sub-linear in L^*, the cumulative loss of the optimal policy. Subsequently, we use a neural network for function approximation and online gradient descent as the regression oracle to provide tildeO(√KT + K/α) and tildeO(√KL^* + K (1 + 1/α)) regret bounds, respectively. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithms on real-world data and show that they significantly outperform the existing baseline while maintaining the performance guarantee.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.